Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Power Point: An Oafish Bulleted World

At my daughter's school, technology now takes a firm foothold in the daily curriculum. By grade eight, all students are proficient in Word, Power Point and Excel. Unfortunately, under the sway of technology marketers, the school board has minimized former mainstays of the primary and middle school experience. Orchestra, chorus, art, photography and band are a glimmer of what they used to be when children and teens had time to explore. It's been reduced to this, which while worthy, is yet a pale imitation of what we once had.
A bus full of computers and video equipment that makes the rounds to the schools.
No doubt, a valuable communication tool, but everything we bring to the bench must be met with a critical eye to ensure its being used properly.

Parents are to blame, too. They are convinced if their child doesn't have his or her own lap top by the eighth grade, he or she will be consigned to a life of penury. Glibly allured of success and riches, the parents (at some schools) whip out their high-percent credit card to lease a lap top in a 1:1 program supported by the board. And so it is, children should be able to put the history of California missions on an eight page Power Point presentation. That's right, all sixty four years of it.

To be fair there isn't an institution that hasn't fallen sway under the false promise of higher efficiency and clearer understanding that Power Point promises. Power Point presentations are de rigeur in businesses, governmental and non governmental agencies. Armed with laptops, people stride into rooms with a presentation guaranteed to bullet main points. No where is this more true than in the military. Want to understand the intricate military strategy Afghanistan? How about this:
In a great article titled, We Have Met The Enemy, and He Is Power Point in The New York Times, General McChrystal was said to have dryly remarked,
"When we understand that slide, we'll have won the war."
He's not the only one tired of the endless slides. General Mattis, upon deciding not to use it when speaking at a conference in North Carolina said, "Power Point makes us stupid." And General McMaster said,
“It’s dangerous because it can create the illusion of understanding and the illusion of control,” General McMaster said in a telephone interview afterward. “Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable.”
As he points out, adhering to a rigid bullet point style presentation with frequently changing slides, often doesn't account for the intricacies and nuances of social, political, economic and ethnic forces. It doesn't take into account history, either. “If you divorce war from all of that, it becomes a targeting exercise,” says General McMaster. And yet, officers and NCO's spend inordinate amounts of time on this technology.

So onward we let our children trudge a path that Generals are claiming is shaded by falsehood. Sometimes the less information you present, the less information you actually comprehend. If only some points are presented, this means the big picture might be an abstraction. Power Point presentations are akin to slimmed down Cliff Notes: you know the main characters of a book, you have a general idea of what they do, but you have no idea of why they carry out their actions. And I'm not saying, hey, don't do it. But I am saying we have to keep it in check. Perhaps parents should spend far more time hauling the kids to the library, letting them check out whatever books they want (no matter how looney), than spending it on the computer. In-depth knowledge is everything. Observing, listening, communicating and trying by doing is everything. Making a Power Point presentation about The Thirty Years War reduced to 10 slides may be interesting and time consuming, but it doesn't necessarily increase the depth of one's own understanding.

Orchestra, band, chorus, and art are important because through those we learn intricacies, nuance, and relationships. We see and hear how notes strung together can create a harmony. We experiment mixing colors, fiddle around with how to shade, figure out what perspective does to the appearance of an object. These are all nuances, finer points, and taking those out of the big picture leaves us with one thing: a bulleted Power Point presentation of life. This gives rise to half formed opinions and clumsily made decisions for an oafish world where no one wins.

15 comments:

  1. My son and I were just talking about this, as related to American History and how exciting it is and how little school children know about it. The History channel has a new series just starting. Exciting
    As for art in school... we now teach to the test and have thrown out Music, Art and P.E. to do it.
    How exciting is it to feel the color that goes on the paper along with what you see.
    I am so happy my children are out of school and missed most of this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah, it's a pile of hooey. A lot of these applications are learned on the spot by doing. Besides, they're all going to change greatly in the next 2 - 3 years.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Technology, and all the attendant accessories, is a tool. There's nothing wrong with tools. Tools assist when used properly.

    For example, I've been using Excel spreadsheets to compose sonnets. I put the rhyming scheme down the left side of the sheet and then label 10 columns to represent the number of syllables in each line. This allows me to focus on content rather than format.

    For my money, Power Point is an excellent tool to present information and to start discussions. I don't use it to solve anything; rather it helps to structure, compartmentalize, and summarize.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's right. It's a TOOL. And I think we constantly have to evaluate how we're using TOOLS.
    If we're using TOOLS as a shortcut to real understanding, then we are misusing the TOOL.

    And I think to some extent, parents have to be careful and realize that just because Johnny is doing a power point presentation, that he might not understand all the nuances. We also can't keep robbing Peter to pay Paul as the costs of technology rise.

    What we have to be careful of is the POWER POINT CULTURE which has given rise to sad but true jokes in the military of POWER POINT RANGERS.
    Be sure you READ the NEW YORK TIMES article in its entirety.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How did Dylan Thomas write without excel? Oh my!

    I think those who defend this aren't getting the point: there's a real problem with an overuse and substitution of depth in place of the quickness of power point. Death by Power Point may be an exaggeration, yet, many of us have found the monotony of them sleep inducing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kanani: Once again, great minds think and write alike! I saw that you'd pointed to the NYT article after I'd already commented on it at the Gray Lady's "At War" blog. Small Internet!

    I'm expanding those comments on my Red Bull Rising blog on Thursday. (Local news trumps and bumps it back a day.) Most notably, I think you and your readers are right to consider BOTH the tool as affecting both thought and the presentation of it.

    I've seen similar debates in writing classes, about whether it's better to use legal pads and pencils, or type on a laptop. And in architectural studios, where the issue is whether designers should learn first to draw before manipulating designs on a computer.

    Usually, the answer is "just use what feels right." But to end the discussion there ignores the influence any tool inherently has on the designed object: I write differently with pen and paper. I potentially come to new and different solutions when sketching, than I do while drawing with a computer mouse.

    The medium influences / shapes / becomes / is the message.

    Users need to understand HOW PowerPoint structures / compartimentalizes / summarizes thought, in order that they not be limited by (or to) it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Update: I sent the NY Times article to a few of my daughter's teachers. One of them took it upon herself and read my blog. She sent back an indignant response.

    True, as we all know it's just one tool in her arsenal. In addition, the bus is just one more tool to teach multimedia skills. However, what can't be ignored is that all this comes at a great cost. And we also know that the way business works to some extent is by taking fron one program to expand another. The district is no different.

    As the cost of technology rises, so will the costs of the district. And so we have to be critical of what we are doing, and more to the point, whether or not the tools are being used correctly.

    Marc Danziger, a social media and networking strategist armed with a Ph.D, wrote about this on his blog, Winds of Change. I highly recommmend you read his post The Deadly Decks of Afghanistan. He quotes the NY Times article, and also says,
    "As someone who periodically works for organizations that have PowerPoint embedded in their DNA, and who is pretty handy with a bullet list, this terrifies me. It's part and parcel of a kind of institutional thinking that is 180 degrees from what's needed in a dynamic, complex decisionmaking environment where information should be organically structured and encourage thinking instead of snappy five-word summaries of thought.

    PowerPoint has already been blamed for the deaths of the seven crew members on the Columbia. Here's the Columbia Accident Investigation Board as cited by Edward Tufte."

    So when I say question, and even nudge, I expect people to get mad. But before sending me an indignant letter, how about thinking things through?
    At no point in my post did I advocate doing away with Power Point. It's permeated our culture. It'd be like telling people they can't text anymore.
    But question it? Absolutely. Every step of the way. It's the only way one can evaluate, and adjust with an eye to the future.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It really sounds Horrific! How did this happen? I have heard of Power Point but I'm not even swure that I know what it does---I know more now, sort of, having read your post and I saw that article in TNYT today, but in all honesty, I didn't really get it.
    Oh how I wish that they would stick to ALL the "arts" in schools and forget about all this other stuff....If one is in ORCHESTRA for instance, you learn so much about so many things besides music---like Co-Operation and Sharing and Feeling things.....That is what our kids should be learning and doing---Creating Art!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Charlie, Yes the medium influences the shape and even the content. I think it's worth considering all these questions. If we don't, and we keep cruising along, that's how we find ourselves in the situation that can range from mind numblingly dull but harmless, to accepted without question and deadly.

    Naomi, No one complains when a music teachers begin to become itinerants, going from school to school. Not many people notice that in conversation, someone can mix up Renoir and Rachmaninoff.

    I think fine --teach from it. Use it as a tool. But do make sure that students are using it only to shape, and not in place of deeper learning.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Question the "institutional thinking."

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm so glad I went to school in an era where we had to learn creative problem solving and did so many hands-on things. We learned sharing, cooperation, and how to think strategically. I haven't found that I get that from a computer. I'm thinking of giving up my computer tech job to become a gardener or a cook! The sight of that arts bus actually depresses me if that's replaced the creative classroom.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for using the capital letters in your response to me. I would have completely missed your point if you hadn't.

    Have a pleasant day.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Travis, I felt that people were missing the point of the entire article. That while Power Point is a tool, it isn't a substitute for deeper learning.
    And while it is a good tool, it does shape the material, which in turns changes the way we think.
    I think the quote:
    "It’s dangerous because it can create the illusion of understanding and the illusion of control,” General McMaster said in a telephone interview afterward. “Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable.”
    is the one to always remember.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Melanie, They still have art in schools. But it's wedged in or worked in to a lot of things. There isn't the same level of experimentation with mediums as there was when we were kids. This weekend I had to show my daughter how to mix acrylic paints. The proper way to utilize them.

    There is a very small group of us in town (and I mean 2-3 of us) who really takes this issue to heart. But really, while they'd love to write us off as luddites, I don't think you could find 3 people who are more involved with social media and networking as well as programming than us!

    But we're really nudging a mindset, and that's never an easy thing to do, and it always upsets a few people.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Computers are tools, bit, sadly, many schools use them as crutches.

    Here's my take: How on Earth did we Americans ever manage to land men on the moon and bring them home safely? Seriously, all we had to work with were pencils, paper and slide rules. The Apollo spacecraft had an onboard computer only slightly more powerful than the one in my microwave oven.

    We have teachers who have teaching degrees rather than degrees in the subjects they teach. That is, by itself, a recipe for disaster, because these "teachers" have no way, nor inclination, to verify the material they are given to "teach". They end up following a syllabus prepared by someone else, supported by books written by others, and all about a subject they likely have but a cursory acquaintance with.

    Art? Music? If the eyes are the window to the soul, then music is it's voice, and we are seemingly well on our way to raising a bunch of mutes.

    I home school my daughter because the thought of sending her to a public school is unacceptable. I have no reserves about calling for this nation to take a time out, and bull doze every public school into rubble, rebuild, hire new teachers, ban unions, and start all over again.

    YMMV, of course, but after three kids and seeing how much of their education I have had to correct, I am finished with the public school system. It is broken, and must needs be replaced.

    Respects,

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.